About Me

Name: Jesse "The Mind"...
Email: jno2179536@aol.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

A REPLY TO O'REILLY'S INTERVIEW WITH BILL MAHER, FROM ONE OFTHE ELECTION OF GRACE

Foxnews Channel’s Bill O’Reilly had an interview with Christianphobic Bill Maher, which aired in two parts on September 29th and 30th. Progressives love to marginalize people by making that “phobia” charge, so I’ll play their game with a little bit more integrity. I do believe while they might not fear Christians, they do fear Christian principles because it gets in the way of their objectives. I watched the interview and got pretty much what I thought I was going to get out of O’Reilly and Maher. I do have to say I was a bit shocked at how little faith Bill O’Reilly has. He said that he believed that the Old Testament was more allegorical than literal when arguing with Maher about the flood. I’ll get to that first. What neither man explained was that there is scientific evidence that there was a great flood long ago, and that the legend of the flood is a worldwide one. In China, they have the legend of the flood and a great ship. If it wasn’t written in the Old Testament, there would still be the legend of the flood. They also have possible visual evidence on Mount Ararat something made of wood sticking out of the ice from satellite pictures. Where does the Old Testament say the ark of Noah rested? On Mount Ararat.

Maher also brought up that the OT in Deuteronomy says to stone your neighbor for working on the sabbath day. As O’Reilly said after the airing of the interview, Maher was incorrect with his accusation. Leave it to an atheist to know the word of God. God did say a man will be put to death for not keeping the sabbath (actually written in Leviticus), but as I wrote in my last blog “God’s Tolerance In The Old Testament”, His strict laws were for the Jews only. Moses repeated many laws in Deuteronomy just before the Jews entered into Israel and repeatedly said after many of them either “because God has made Himself known to you alone” or to “put the evil away from you”. What he meant by putting the evil away from the Jews was to keep the influence of Satan out of their cities once they inhabited Israel. When God created Adam and Eve, He also created the “tree of knowledge”. He did so for a reason. He forbad them to ever eat from it. God’s intention was that someone else would eat from it many years later, or else He wouldn’t have created it. The serpent was really Satan (Rev 20:2), and his purpose of beguiling Eve was to bring onto our creation sin and death before its due time. Someone at some point would have eaten from that tree. Because sin and death were brought in before their time, to save Israel and our creation as long as possible, God made some harsh rules and standards for the Jews. It was only to them He gave proof of His existence. For that, they had a much higher standard. By the time Jesus lived, the influence of Satan was upon the whole Earth. It was so rampant that men were about to stone a woman for infidelity when they too had committed sins worthy of death. That’s why Jesus said after probably writing their sins in the dirt “let he who is without sin cast the first stone”. They left quickly and let the woman alone. Jesus also correctly pointed out that the sabbath was there for man, not God.

Politically speaking, Maher said on O’Reilly’s show and has tons of other times that Americans (especially those that abide by the Constitution) are moronic. He just typifies many socialists/marxists. He has said that the Constitution is outdated and has outlived its purpose. Mostly the Constitution deals with powers limiting the government, especially the federal government. The great thing about the Founding Fathers is that they seized power from the British and made the unheard of gesture of saying “we don’t want it”. Not only didn’t they want that power, but they didn’t want anyone else to have it either. People who believe in that must be dumb, eh? I am a moron to Bill Maher, who would be more than happy to have an IQ test with him any day of the week and would do so in front as many people as possible. I, moron challenge Bill Maher and any other socialist/marxist that believes that Americans are idiots for believing in the righteousness of the Constitution to name me one success story of a socialist run state. They’re the supergeniuses while as I am a moron, so let’s hear of this sophisiticatedly superior state. Me being a moron can’t think of one. Why are conservative Americans thought of as morons and socialists thought of as geniuses, but all the evidence is on the side of the morons? Why are Christians thought of as hateful people but people like Bill Maher are thought of as brutally honest intellectuals? Come on, Bill. Name me a socialist state that didn’t get run into the ground and freedoms weren’t taken away? Bet you can’t do it, but yet I’m the moron.

To Bill Maher, here is something I have yet to see an atheist explain away or tear down with ANY integrity. Jesus said on the cross “My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?”, in which he was quoting the first part of Psalm 22:1. Verse 16 says, “For dogs have compassed me; the assembly of the wicked have inclosed me; they pierced my hands and my feet.” This was written around 1000BC. I’d love an explanation. I don’t want to hear about mistranslations or that the authors of the KJV made it look that way. The reason for those is the word “pierced” in the original Hebrew is the word “aw-ree” which does indeed mean “pierced”, and if the authors wrote the KJV (instead of apostles) and made up what Jesus said to make it look like he’s the Messiah, then their own doctrine is wrong and disputes with what they wrote. The New Testament was originally written in Greek, then the Catholic Church translated it into Latin with the Vulgate. The King James Version is the English version of the Vulgate. The doctrine of the Catholic Church as to why Jesus said that on the cross is that it was his moment of doubt and pain. Not quoting part of Psalm 22:1. That means they couldn’t have written that themselves to make it look like Jesus was the Messiah since their doctrine was that he spoke to God on the cross. Why what he said on the cross wasn’t a sin was because he wasn’t speaking to God, but quoting Psalm 22 proving he was the Christ. By the way, the Jews knew nothing of crucifixion until the Romans came in 76BC. Yes, explain that away, Mr. Maher.

To Bill O’Reilly, you better do some more homework about the Bible because it was clear that you were uncomfortable talking about your knowledge of it. “The OT is full of allegory”…? Come on, man. Because O’Reilly wasn’t secure about his faith and knowledge of the Bible, Maher made him look like a fool in that exchange. O’Reilly’s answer to Maher was at the best super-flimsy. I hate it when people speak of the Bible (on both sides) and they make it clear they know very little or nothing about what’s actually written. If they speak in favor of it but do it in an unsubstantial way, then all Christians look the fool compared to someone who has a hateful look upon Christianity but has pertinent questions about their beliefs. My advice to those that don’t know the Word well, don’t argue with those that want to tear it down. Don’t quote it if you don’t know it.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

IS PRESIDENT OBAMA A CHRISTIAN?

No, he’s not. Is he a Muslim? Doubt it. I do find it odd that people from the Muslim group CAIR are out defending Obama saying he’s not a Muslim. Yeah, that’s odd. Why would they care? I count myself among the growing percentage of those that don’t know what he is. Am I to blame? I am quicker to blame myself for things than anyone I know, but to this subject I would respectfully have to say that I am not to blame. President Obama is to blame.

Please don’t fall for the Alinsky tactic of dividing then humiliating your opponents by also noting many don’t believe Obama is a naturalized US citizen to mock those on the right. I bet there is a bigger percentage of people on the left that believe Bush did 9/11 than those on the right who don’t believe Obama was born in the US. Wanna take that bet? Which is more believable. To set the record straight, I believe wholly that Obama was born in the US and have attacked those on the right that don’t believe it. My thoughts are clear and my conclusions aren’t destinations I strive to arrive at. I let the truth come and take my wants completely out of my thought processes. I’d rather have the truth of something that I’d hate than a lie I would love. That’s the truth.

I know many will say “didn’t he go to Reverend Wright’s church for twenty years? Isn’t that a Christian church? Yes he did go there for twenty years, but no that’s not a Christian church. That goes for many churches and individuals that identify themselves as Christian though. As for the individual, Jesus himself said that just because you say “Lord, Lord! I knew you!”, it doesn’t mean God will say “I knew you too.” Many have called themselves Christians and have done despicable things inspired by their supposed Christian beliefs, but in no possible sane way can point out scripture that justifies their beliefs. President Obama and that church are no different.

Reverend Wright taught black liberation theology at his church, which means white people (especially Jews) are to blame for all of their problems. It seems that all of Obama’s “friends” have some sort of hatred for the Jews and the state of Israel. I will say this about that church and for any other church or individual that has hatred for the Jews for any particular reason: you are not only not being Christian, but you’re being demonic. Who accounts himself with those that hate the Jews? The one that will come.

When Satan arrives in his angelic flesh, he will go after the Jews along with those aligned with him. The story of him coming after the woman that beared the man child is Satan’s attack on the nation of Israel. The man child is Jesus, and the woman that beared him was Mary, a Jew. I know many Catholic theologians believe it really means Satan is coming after their church, since Mary has reached deity-status, but I can shoot that belief down conclusively with no problem. It is written that the world will come and meet for war at a place known in the Hebrew tongue as Armageddon. Many mistake Armageddon as a time, not a place. Armageddon comes from two Hebrew words “har” and “Megiddo”. “Har” is the Hebrew word for mountain. Megiddo is in the valley of Jezreel in northern Israel. Let me ask anyone that believes the woman is really the Catholic Church a question: Is the Catholic Church in Megiddo? Satan and his Jew-hating zombies will come and meet for war at Megiddo to take out the Jews in Israel. Anyone that hates Jews and the state of Israel now will have a seering hatred for them then, unless they change. Have those people aligned themselves with Christ or Satan?

President Obama also pushes a self-messianic image for the cult of the spiritually empty. At his inaugural speech, he said that he will cool the Earth and the seas will lower. Humility, eh? He has shown his contempt for the nation of Israel as do all his marxists mentors. Look them up. What he has said. What they have said. And that he had marxist mentors. In a private conversation, Obama would probably admit that he’s a marxist. His father was. His mentors were. His church was. Marxists have a particular problem with not only Jews, but Christians and the American capitalist ideal as well.

As reported on Glenn Beck’s show, Obama has preached about his salvation being a “collective salvation” and also has told others that their salvation can only come by the collective. There is not much more of an anti-Christian thing to say than that. As also reported on Beck’s show, Pope Benedict said that societies that try to become a collective salvation of sorts is actually demonic. I’m nowhere near a Catholic, but that is true. An individual must find their own salvation with the Lord. To do so in a collective way means the government become the religion. A government dominated by flawed, power-hungry, sinful men. How does such a government think they can bring salvation? It has happened in the past many times, especially in Europe. Collective solutions for individual problems. Ideas of trying to make things better without a hint of pragmatism, so solutions become much worse… and yes, demonic. I do find it also odd that marxists and others who want a huge government apparatus call those that don’t “uneducated” and every other name of the book that it’s been tried before and has failed everytime it’s been put in place. Who are the educated ones? They mock those that want a limited government pretty much saying “they don’t know how good it is to have a big government take care of you”. We have history after history of marxist governments failing without a hint of a success story. Not only have they failed, but the worst mass killings have come from marxist governments by Stalin and Mao Tse Tung to name a couple. Many people died under Stalin from starvation while the nation had enough food to go around. I don’t see how that type of government can entice anyone. I guess that’s why Karl Marx himself called those that got behind that movement “useful idiots”. Why not “partners” or “allies” since they were on the same side? Marx knew Paul would get behind a government movement that would rob Peter to pay Paul, even if it were only a crumb, while the rest went to a power hungry government. That’s why he called them “useful idiots”.

President Obama and many on the left have martyred a man named Saul Alinsky, whom I mentioned earlier. Saul Alinsky was a community organizer in Chicago and wrote a book called “Rules For Radicals”. President Obama taught Alinsky’s book in his class when he was a professor and is in no question using Alinsky’s tactics now as President. No question. Alinsky was not someone a Christian would look up to. He hated Jews. Gee, that’s a shock. He was a devout marxist. Another one, Mr. President? He even had people dress as the Klan to pose as the other side to humiliate them. That is something that is being used today, and will definitely be used in the future with the Tea Party people as the target. Notice the collective attack on them by the media calling them “violent racists”, yet the truth doesn’t match their claims. Wonder why they do that, and in such a collective way. Guess who Alinsky dedicated his book to? Marx? Nope, worse. Castro? No, worse. Stalin? No, worse even. He dedicated his book “Rules For Radicals” to Lucifer. Why would a Christian follow a guy who dedicates his book to Lucifer and hates Jews?

President Obama and the DNC have taken so much money from a man named George Soros. I’m sure most have heard his name, and even those that pay attention don’t truly know who he is. Since he’s funding only democratic politicians, as well as some media outlets, many on the right believe he has a political agenda. Soros has never had a political agenda. Soros is out to make money. He crippled the British economy purposely along with his hedgefund investors and made many millions doing so. While Britons suffered, he profited at their suffering purposely. Now why do you think he’s funding politicians here? Political ideals or to cause us to go broke as he gets even more rich off of our suffering? It also makes it clearer why we’re spending so much money in the red while getting no results. The Stimulus Package in particular was a bill to spend money we didn’t have while not having any benefit to the US economy. It wasn’t meant to help. Just look at where the money went and tell me how it was supposed to create jobs. Remember, we had to pass it without reading it? It was an emergency or unemployment would go above 8%? If it was such an emergency in early 2009, then why haven’t we spent half of the money yet? Plus Obama and his media croneys have gone from “jobs created” to “jobs saved”, and the newest one “lives touched” as a way to promote the Stimlus as a success. Only the mindless or the liars will go along with that claim. President Obama knew who Soros was, and so does the DNC. They knew what he did in Britain, so why would they partner with him? Would a Christian partner with someone that has taken down a nation and seems poised to do it to ours as well? Soros is right now betting big against the dollar, which is why he paid democratic politicians and the media. To make money as our country suffers. If Obama is innocent of just making a bad judgment of character (yet again), do you think he’ll distance himself from Soros and his money in the future? I’ve got property on the Moon for sale if you do. Obama is doing what he was told to do. Add these things up and they don’t equal a Christian in the eyes of anyone that really knows what it means to be a Christian. Obama’s personal religion in my opinion is himself and his own glorification. Just because one says they are a Christian it doesn’t mean they are one.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

MISTRANSLATIONS AND NAME MEANINGS IN THE KING JAMES BIBLE

I have written many blogs in the past which correct mistranslations in the King James as well as newer translations of the Bible. I have said in the past that the King James is still the best English translated Bible there is, but I have recently come to know the Gideon’s Bible. The language is updated and many of the KJV mistranslations are corrected. Without going back to correct my previous posts, I will now say the Gideon’s Bible is the best English Bible out there. The reason why I don’t want to go back and correct myself is so you know I am still learning myself, since I had not looked into a Gideon’s at that time. I still suggest for all to get a Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance and use a KJV with it if you want a full, true word of God. The Strong’s traces every word of the KJV back to the original Hebrew and Greek without the influence of men. This is extremely important for the true student.

The most important mistranslation in the KJV is inside the New Testament with the phrase “end of the world”. Only in the NT is that phrase written, and in each case in the original Greek the word there for “world” does not trace back to “κοσμοσ” (cos-mos), which is their word for “world”. Every single instance the original Greek word was actually “αιων” (ahee-own), which is their word for “age”. Not world. In some cases, it can mean world but let’s look at the gospel of Matthew. Four times the phrase “end of the world” shows up, again all were “αιων” in Greek, but other times the word “world” in Matthew cosmos is used. Why would Matthew use different words if he meant the same thing? Answer: he didn’t mean the same thing. He meant “age”, so he used a different Greek word than cosmos. What makes this so important is it shows there is no end of the world. If you look at Matt. 24:3, the disciples ask Jesus for the signs of his return and the end of the age. If you take that to heart and read Revelation 20, then you can make sense of it. When Jesus returns, that ends this age and begins a new age that will last a little over a thousand years. Without knowing Jesus’ return ends this age, Rev. 20 cannot be made sense of. The Gideon’s corrects those mistakes.

In one of the most intriguing mistranslations of the KJV is the craft Ezekiel saw. In the KJV it says the color of it was amber. That is a mistranslation. The Hebrew word there was (khazh-mal), which means “polished spectrum metal with an amber hue”, or beryl. Not a grainy amber color. Given the other descriptions of the craft Ezekiel saw, it could not be anything made of this world at that time. The Gideon’s also corrects this.

Jesus wasn’t our Lord’s real name. Jesus is the English pronunciation of the Greek version of the Hebrew name Yeshua (or Y’shua). Y’shua means “God saved”. If you took Y’shua and directly translated it to English, it would be Joshua. It doesn’t matter so much what you call him, as long as you call him Christ, Saviour, Lord, and the Son of the Living God. His mother Mary is the English version of Maria. Pronounced in their native Aramaic tongue, it would sound like (mah-ree-AH). Maria in Hebrew means “bitter”.

Satan in the Hebrew means “opponent, adversary”, and in some instances can mean “persecute”. Very apt names, which the definitions really mean something. Satan is the opponent and adversary, and has/will persecute(d) our creation. Another very important mistranslation in the KJV is because of an assumption made by men. In Isaiah 14:12, the word “Lucifer” shows up for the only time in the KJV. The original Hebrew word there wasn’t anything near Lucifer at all. The original Hebrew word there was “Helel”. Why change it to Lucifer? Because the Catholic Church, which authored the KJV translated the name into Latin with the Vulgate. Lucifer is a Latin word. Isaiah nor any other OT prophet knew Latin. Helel means “brightness”, while Lucifer means “morningstar”. One must ask, why the huge differences in not only the names but the meanings? Helel/Lucifer is mentioned only one time in the entire Bible, so why only there? It describes how Helel fell. After he fell, God changed his name. He was the morningstar. Now he’s the adversary.

Another important and intriguing mistranslation of the KJV is the word “giants” in Genesis 6:4. The original Hebrew word there was “nephil” (neh-feel), which is their word for “fallen”. This mistranslation also shows up in Numbers 13:33, which also describes them being like grasshoppers. If you look at the plague of the locusts in Revelation 9, their master was Apollyon, which is another name in the Greek for the Devil. These points are significant since it shows who those “giants” really were in Genesis and Numbers. They were the fallen angels. “Nephilim” is the Hebrew word for “fallen angels”. When Helel fell, he took many angels with him. They became known as the “nephil”, and their master is the Devil. The plague of locusts is the plague of the fallen angels. I didn’t look if the Gideon’s corrects this or not.

What too many call the final battle between good and evil before the end of the world, Armageddon has nothing to do with a time. Armageddon is two words put together. There is “har” which means “mountain”, and Megiddo means “a gathering’, but also is in the valley of Jezreel in northern Israel near a mountain. Armageddon means “a gathering near a mountain in Megiddo”. That is where the world will come to meet for battle against Israel and the forces of God. Both the OT and NT speak of Megiddo being the place for the final battle, but as I stated before, not for the end of the world. Armageddon will be fought at the climax of this age, but afterward a new age will begin once Y’shua has returned.

I hope this post not only gives you a new insight on the written Word, but also inspires you to get a Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance since it will open your eyes. It doesn’t preach. It doesn’t have any link to a denomination. All it does is trace the words back to the original languages for a pure word of God without the influence of men. If you truly want to learn, a Strong’s is a must.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

MISTRANSLATIONS AND NAME MEANINGS IN THE KING JAMES BIBLE

I have written many blogs in the past which correct mistranslations in the King James as well as newer translations of the Bible. I have said in the past that the King James is still the best English translated Bible there is, but I have recently come to know the Gideon’s Bible. The language is updated and many of the KJV mistranslations are corrected. Without going back to correct my previous posts, I will now say the Gideon’s Bible is the best English Bible out there. The reason why I don’t want to go back and correct myself is so you know I am still learning myself, since I had not looked into a Gideon’s at that time. I still suggest for all to get a Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance and use a KJV with it if you want a full, true word of God. The Strong’s traces every word of the KJV back to the original Hebrew and Greek without the influence of men. This is extremely important for the true student.

The most important mistranslation in the KJV is inside the New Testament with the phrase “end of the world”. Only in the NT is that phrase written, and in each case in the original Greek the word there for “world” does not trace back to “κοσμοσ” (cos-mos). Every single instance the original Greek word was actually “αιων” (ahee-own), which is their word for age. In some examples, it can mean world but let’s look at the gospel of Matthew. Four times the phrase “end of the world” shows up, again all were “αιων” in Greek, but other times the word “world” in Matthew cosmos is used. Why would Matthew use different words if he meant the same thing? Answer is: he didn’t mean the same thing. He meant “age”, so he used a different Greek word than cosmos. What makes this so important is it shows there is no end of the world. If you look at Matt. 24:3, the disciples ask Jesus for the signs of his return and the end of the age. If you take that to heart and read Revelation 20, then you can make sense of it. When Jesus returns, that ends this age and begins a new age that will last a little over a thousand years. Without knowing Jesus’ return ends this age, Rev. 20 cannot be made sense of. The Gideon’s corrects those mistakes.

In one of the most intriguing mistranslations of the KJV is the craft Ezekiel saw. In the KJV it says the color of it was amber. That is a mistranslation. The Hebrew word there was (khazh-mal), which means “polished spectrum metal with an amber hue”, or beryl. Not a grainy amber color. Given the other descriptions of the craft Ezekiel saw, it could not be anything made of this world at that time. The Gideon’s also corrects this.

Jesus wasn’t our Lord’s real name. Jesus is the English pronunciation of the Greek version of the Hebrew name Yeshua (or Y’shua). Y’shua means “God saved”. If you took Y’shua and directly translated it to English, it would be Joshua. It doesn’t matter so much what you call him, as long as you call him Christ, Saviour, Lord, and the Son of the Living God. His mother Mary is the English version of Maria. Pronounced in their native Aramaic tongue, it would sound like (mah-ree-AH). Maria in Hebrew means “bitter”.

Satan in the Hebrew means “opponent, adversary”, and in some instances can mean “persecute”. Very apt names, which the definitions really mean something. Satan is the opponent and adversary, and has/will persecute(d) our creation. Another very important mistranslation in the KJV is because of an assumption made by men. In Isaiah 14:12, the word “Lucifer” shows up for the only time in the KJV. The original Hebrew word there wasn’t anything near Lucifer at all. The original Hebrew word there was “Helel”. Why change it to Lucifer? Because the Catholic Church, which authored the KJV translated the name into Latin with the Vulgate. Lucifer is a Latin word. Isaiah nor any other OT prophet knew Latin. Helel means “brightness”, while Lucifer means “morningstar”. One must ask, why the huge differences in not only the names but the meanings? Helel/Lucifer is mentioned only one time in the entire Bible, so why only there? It describes how Helel fell. After he fell, God changed his name. He was the morningstar. Now he’s the adversary.

Another important and intriguing mistranslation of the KJV is the word “giants” in Genesis 6:4. The original Hebrew word there was “nephil” (neh-feel), which is their word for “fallen”. This mistranslation also shows up in Numbers 13:33, which also describes them being like grasshoppers. If you look at the plague of the locusts in Revelation 9, their master was Apollyon, which is another name in the Greek for the Devil. These points are significant since it shows who those “giants” really were in Genesis and Numbers. They were the fallen angels. “Nephilium” is the Hebrew word for “fallen ones”. When Helel fell, he took many angels with him. They became known as “nephil”, and their master is the Devil. The plague of locusts is the plague of the fallen angels. I didn’t look if the Gideon’s corrects this or not.

What too many call the final battle between good and evil before the end of the world, Armageddon has nothing to do with a time. Armageddon is two words put together. There is “erme” which means “a gathering”, and Megiddo is a place. Megiddo is in the valley of Jezreel in northern Israel. Armageddon means “a gathering in Megiddo”. That is where the world will come to meet for battle against Israel and the forces of God. Both the OT and NT speak of Megiddo being the place for the final battle, but as I stated before, not for the end of the world. Armageddon will be fought at the climax of this age, but afterward a new age will begin once Y’shua has returned.

I hope this post not only gives you a new insight on the written Word, but also inspires you to get a Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance since it will open your eyes. It doesn’t preach. It doesn’t have any link to a denomination. All it does is trace the words back to the original languages for a pure word of God without the influence of men. If you truly want to learn, a Strong’s is a must.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

IS THERE A PURGATORY?

In a word, no. Don’t worry, I’ll elaborate. Purgatory was invented by men to do one thing: increase money to the church. If you donate enough money, your stay in purgatory will be less than if you didn’t. This is another power taken away from God by some churches and put into the hands of men. Always when men take powers away from God, they invent something that is not written anywhere in the Bible.

There is no evidence of a purgatory in the Bible, and I’ve looked. Those that came up with purgatory claim it’s to purify souls before reaching heaven. The soul has no need of purification because it’s already out of this sinful human flesh. The soul is pure already. Whether that soul is worthy of heaven, everlasting life, or punishment is up to One. Nobody else. Either way, once the soul has been loosened from this human prison it goes straight to the Maker. From there God chooses whether that soul goes with Abraham and Lazarus or on the other side of the gulf with the rich man. There is no pit stop on its way.

One should ask themselves if a person makes the right choice and lives their lives honorably why God would make them suffer through something called “purgatory”. It’s just another manmade creation to make those that believe in it to give more money to the churches that have purgatory as part of their doctrine.

Paul said to be absent from this body is to be present with the Lord. Does that sound like there is a stop at something at purgatory? On the rare occasion when someone dies and are brought back to life, the common thing seen is a tunnel of white light. If you imagine yourself travelling through space with stars, galaxies, and other heavenly objects flying by you many times the speed of light, what would you be seeing? A tunnel of white light. Does that sound like there is a purgatory?

Men do such wicked things in the eyes of God by inventing things of God that do not exist for the sake of their own cause. This is the silliest and least biblical example possible. I dare any theologian, priest, cardinal, pope to find me biblical evidence of purgatory. They can’t do it because it doesn’t exist. Men should be careful about inventing things to take power away from God and putting power into their own hands on such matters because God just may invent some things right back of His own. This is one of those things that angers me personally. I find it insulting when men invent things of God with no backing from God’s word. I issue a challenge to those that believe in purgatory. Find me biblical evidence. Not logic of why there might or should be a purgatory. Not who came up with it. Not it’s purpose. Find me biblical evidence of it. There is no such thing as purgatory. Take that to the bank.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

THE AUTHENTIC BIBLICAL HISTORY OF SATAN

Some people hear “Lucifer” and “Satan” and just think those are the names of the devil and don’t even question why. There is a huge difference between the two names and when they were his names. When taking all of this in with the meaning of his names, it can provide you a whole lot of wisdom about not just him, but about us and why we are here. That’s a trip for you to take if you decide to though. I cannot go any further than where this post ends.

In the KJV and other translated versions of the Bible, for some reason they mistranslated the word "Lucifer". Lucifer in the Hebrew is actually Helel (hay-LALE). If you open a Hebrew OT, it would read in the Hebrew "Helel", not Lucifer. The definition of it is “morning star”. Only one time does the Bible mention the word Helel, or “Lucifer”. That is in Isaiah 14:12. There’s a reason for that. It mentions what Helel’s crime was, in which he was banished from God and sentenced to everlasting torture. It says Helel exalted himself above all of the other stars of God and tried to be the god of the congregation. Helel was Satan’s name before he committed his crime.

Satan in the Hebrew means “the opponent” or “adversary”. There’s a reason for that too. Satan is what he became after his crime. He was the morning star, and now he’s the adversary. Since the days of Adam, he has been known as Satan. The reason why he’s mentioned as Lucifer in Isaiah 14:12 is because that’s what he was known as when he committed this crime. Since the days of Adam, Satan has been the adversary. People don’t trace back what is written in Revelation 20:2 back to the serpent written of in Genesis with Adam and Eve. “And he laid hold on the dragon, THAT OLD SERPENT, which is the devil and Satan and bound him for a thousand years.” What was John of Patmos referring to?

Ba’al was a fertility god of the pagans, but was he more than that? In Elijah’s time, Ba’al was the great opponent god and Jezebel was the chief pagan prophetess. As Paul reiterates the conversation between Elijah and God in Romans 11, he adds something that really puts traditional teaching into question. As is written, God tells Elijah “I have reserved to myself 7000 men who have not bowed the knee to Ba’al.” Traditional teachers have said that God meant there were 7000 people living in Israel who did not bow the knee to this pagan god. That’s wrong. If God reserves to himself a person, it means that that particular person has not lived yet. Proof of that is what Paul said afterward. “Even so at this present time there is also a remnant according to the election of grace.” A remnant. That means there are still some left. Elijah lived around 900 BC. Paul wrote this around 900 years afterward. There couldn’t be any living still if the traditional teachers are correct. God reserves to himself a person by not letting them live. In that particular conversation God meant that He has reserved to Himself 7000 men (and women) for the last generation. When else? Another secret to all of this is what Ba’al truly was. Ba’al may have been the pagan god of fertility, but he was also the deity of Venus. Lucifer means the morning star. What is the morning star? Venus is. Take it from there. I cannot go any further. I wish you luck.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A CHRISTIAN'S ENTITLEMENT?

I have discussions with other Christians of all kinds of denominations, mostly through the internet since I do not go to church. I learn on my own using a Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance to trace back every word to the original Hebrew and Greek languages. In some discussions I get points of view that are stridently defended which I cannot ascertain how they arrive to those particular conclusions. I get it that denominations teach certain doctrines, but the students fail to ask questions that should raise infrared flags. Easy questions.

The last discussion I had was with several at a time in which they all believe that every Christian was destined to become one. That any Christian is God’s elect, which means God’s chosen. I asked them “is every Christian destined to become one” since this was their obvious point of view. They never decided to ask themselves this question in this particular way and will not answer me. All they will do is point out verses twisted to their point of view. They won’t answer that particular question I asked because in their heart of hearts it doesn’t sound right. These are students of the Reformed Lutheran Church I was told. Really? Every Christian was destined to become one? What about everyone else? Why are they condemned for something they cannot do?

I pointed out to them the parable of the wedding feast which Jesus said many are called, but few are chosen. The best I got was that the parable’s meaning was within its direct context. If that’s the case, then it’s not a parable at all, is it? That would mean the parable of the mustard seed is only about mustard seeds. The parable of the workers of a vineyard was confined to those workers in the field, and so on. As I explained, it is written that Christians are the bride of Christ when he returns. The parable meant that many are called to be at this wedding but few are chosen. Obviously it doesn’t say all are chosen, so that means everyone that will be there cannot be chosen to be there. If there are people at this wedding that are neither chosen or called, then that's it. That should end that debate right there, right? Not for these people. I realize it’s hard to admit you’re wrong about certain things, especially if it’s coming from someone that you entrust to tell you the truth about God’s word. But it doesn’t get any plainer than the parable of the wedding feast that not all Christians were destined to become Christians.

If that’s not enough, then those that believe this should ask yourselves some simple questions:

1. Would only Christians be able to sin? God will not condemn those who are not accountable. If they cannot become a Christian, then how can they achieve forgiveness? If they cannot achieve forgiveness, then they shouldn’t be able to sin.

2. Is every Christian a prophet? Prophets were chosen before they were put in the womb, as is written of Jeremiah. They were not chosen for anything they’ve done in this life to become prophets. If every Christian was also chosen to become one, then what sets them apart from Jeremiah or any other prophet? Another thing, why even have prophets? They would serve no purpose if those who turn to God are destined to.

3. Should you speak about your faith? There’s a difference between expressing your faith and praising God. Should speaking about your faith be for you or for others? If it’s for others, which should be your answer, then it’s pointless, right? They cannot be swayed since they aren’t allowed to. Those who can be swayed are destined to find God anyway.

4. What did they ever do to make God choose them to become Christians, but not prophets? More leftovers from question #2.

5. What is the purpose of this life? Only those who were to find grace were supposed to find it. This life then means nothing. Our souls must be much older than our flesh since God chose Jeremiah before he was in the womb. So why have this life? Someone pointed out to me that what I'm not understanding is that this is about separating the sheep from the goats, not making sheep out of goats. I find that statement amazing and reminds me why I don't go to church. I'm sorry, but that's a garbage statement. We should not preach if the goats cannot be turned into sheep. If there will be no goats turned into sheep, then the divide already exists so again why have this life? OY!

6. Why would Jesus have to speak to people who would become Christians in parables but spoke openly to his disciples if only Christians were able to be swayed? What would be the need of a parable? If there are only those that can understand Jesus' words when they hear it, couldn't he just speak openly to them?

 
These are some very simple questions, and I’m sure there are some of you that can add questions that would be impossible to answer with any confidence by someone holding fast to that doctrine. The ONLY ones destined to become Christian are the few. The prophets. God’s true elect. God chose them. By choosing Jesus or God, you are making your election to Him. Not God making His election of you. When this life is over and the next age comes, then you have a destiny because your fate is sealed. Only those who are the election of grace have a true destiny in this life. As is written of the wedding feast, the election of grace are few. There is no number, but the last generation will have seven thousand as is written in Romans 11. I will leave a link to the explanation of the reiteration of Paul of God and Elijah’s conversation and prove that those seven thousand men and women were not on Earth at that time. In order for God to reserve anyone, He would have to keep their souls until it was time for them to live. That’s how God reserves anyone. The only two that God allowed to live and reserve them are Elijah and Enoch. They never died.
 
 
People need to open their eyes a bit. I realize only the election of grace are without the spirit of slumber, but some things should be easily surpassed by easy questions. Men put on their own slumber with their sense of entitlement, ignorance, and ego. When you are unwilling ( I do not believe unable) to ask yourselves easy questions, then you have hit your ceiling. You cannot go any further, despite God having His own ceiling for you. If you hinder yourselves, you will not even come close to what God is allowing you to reach. Wake up!
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (12) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

HERETICS IN LAMB'S CLOTHING

This is the time when our teachers will fail us the most. It is written it will be so, and so it will be done. With the Easter and Passover holidays over, and the Greek Orthodox Πασχα (PAS-kuh) here today, the worst of the Christian scholars come out to take advantage of the time and put forth some of the worst things you’ll ever hear coming from a supposed Christian. Every year Christian scholars, priests, and other so-called experts meet at something called “The Jesus Seminars”. Many of the Catholic hierarchy come and share their beliefs and usually dominate the discussion. In years past, they have put forth that Jesus never rose from the dead. That Pilate never washed his hands of the crucifixion. That Jesus was eaten by dogs. These are from Christian teachers, mind you. Every year around Easter they meet and come up with heresies against our Lord’s word.

It is written that in the last days there will be a falling away from the faith, as is written in 2nd Thes. 2:3. In Ezekiel 13:20 it says that teachers who teach their flock how to fly will have their flock taken away from them. Something that flies in the face of the rapture doctrine. Also back in 2nd Thes. 2:3 it says that Jesus will not return until the son of perdition is revealed, clarifying what rapture believers say 1st Thes. speaks about, but I digress.

The last days are here. We are not in the Tribulation Period as of yet, but it’s coming soon. Israel is all alone now since they no longer have an ally in the White House. The judgment of the US will come as is written in Isaiah 18:1-3. The last days there will be many false christs and will deceive many. Some will be so convincing that only the election of grace will not be swayed by their words. They aren’t allowed to. Not because they won’t be here. They most certainly will be.

The point of this post is to make sure you know that your teachers will fail you. Not all of them. Perhaps maybe not most of them. Definitely many of them will though. They will twist and turn doctrine and supposed scientific finding to lead you away from what is truly written. They’re already doing it. There is a history of doing this, but it will come to a climax very soon. That is why Jesus finds no fault in only two of the seven churches of Christ in Revelation chapters 2 and 3. That is why he threatens to remove the Church of Ephesus from its place as a Christian church. That church happens to be the biggest denominational church among all in the world. That goes right in line how so many of the attendees at the Jesus Seminars are those representing the Catholic church and wearing their white collars. I don’t know what they’ve come up with for this Easter holiday. Who knows what else they can come up with in the future. One thing is for certain, it will be contrary to what is written. It will be heresy. It will anger our Lord. Those who are of the election of grace KNOW the Lord’s day will come, and He will have His vengeance.

To my Greek friends out there, ΚΑΛΩ ΠΑΣΧΑ! Enjoy your τσουρεκι.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (12) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

2009, PREDICTIONS AND A LOOK FORWARD

2008 was a bad year from nearly all perspectives. The only improvement in 2008 is the situation in Iraq. President Bush and Donald Rumsfeld's stubborn refusal to put in more troops and change strategy postponed the potential success of Iraq off until 2008. If they would have admitted that things weren't going well, maybe they would have made that change. At least President Bush finally opened his eyes after republicans lost the 2006 midterm election and fired Rumsfeld. Rumsfeld would never have admitted the failure of his policy. Good riddance!
 
Economic hardships and international turmoil weighed on the minds of Americans this past election year. America blindly wanted change, just as they did in 2006. They didn't take in how unpopular the democratically-led congress was because their approval rating was nearly a third of Bush's. Be careful of what you wish for.
 
Will 2009 pick up where 2008 left off? Will things improve or will things get worse? Here are some of my predictions for 2009. For most I hope I am wrong, but we shall see. I foresee 2009 as a giant step downward. History will see 2008 merely as a transitional year, and a harbinger of the evil ahead.
 
Oil prices - Just because gas prices have come down in recent months, that doesn't mean they will stay there. As a matter of fact, there is nothing different between now and when gas prices went to $4 a gallon. We are still by far energy dependent. We elected a party that refuses to drill offshore while other countries are off our shores taking what could be ours. OPEC is still the oil producing mafia, and whatever they say goes. The only reason that oil prices went down was because President Bush said he was lifting restrictions to drill offshore. The very next day oil prices started to drop. People who invested nothing in the future's markets saw that they had a good run, but it was time to sell. A hefty profit they made as Americans struggled to get to work. President Obama promises to increase taxes on the oil companies. As many know, businesses do not pay taxes. They increase the price of their products and have us pay for their taxes. In order to actually drill offshore though, congress has to also lift their ban on offshore drilling. The election assured us that this will not happen. The pieces are in place for a return to a steep increase in oil prices. Tensions in the Middle East will also be an excuse for the rise in oil prices. 2009 will see a steady climb in prices by the end of the year.
 
Israel - Israel is using the time between administration changes to try to clean as much house as possible. They're not stupid. They know President Obama will try to cut their legs from under them should Israel be forced to respond to Iran, Syria, Hezbollah, and Hamas. How far it will go will depend on how poll numbers see the Kadima Party in the upcoming elections. If poll numbers show a favorability towards Benjamin Netanyahu and the Likud Party, then it will probably be a significant battle ahead. If poll numbers are in favor of the centrist Kadima Party, then they will only go as far as it takes to make sure they keep power. Recently, Netanyahu and the Likud Party are opening a bigger lead in polls over Livni and the Kadima. Elections will take place February 10th.
 
If Netanyahu wins, Israel will have a leader that will not back down from any threat in the region. He's a hawk, and rightfully so. Israel's enemies are not only on its doorstep in nearly every direction, but they have enemies within. Netanyahu will bring a new policy in dealing with Iran and Syria. Look to Israel sending a message to Iran through Syria. Keep an eye out on what happens to Damascus. Also keep an eye on Madrid sticking its nose where it doesn't belong. The rise of the EU will continue.
 
Russia and China - Both will grow in power. Technology and a smaller world has helped them in ways most can't imagine. Both countries are using countries who hated us for years, but in years past couldn't really do much to us with their hate. Now with technology being more advanced, we are forced to pay heavy attention to the countries we just saw as a nuisance before. That will open up both countries to push their agendas forward. President Obama and the Democratic Party in charge doesn't have the backbone it takes to confront them. We're already in Iraq and Afghanistan, much with Russia and China's help. They blocked us from putting forth a strong message to Saddam Hussein as they made money from the much too seldomly covered UN's "Oil For Food" scandal. What really helps China is that we are in so much debt to them. Americans realize the future Chinese threat, but administration after administration doesn't seem to. For this, we are destined to pay a price.
 
President Obama - The world will test him quickly, just as stated by VP Joe Biden. The enemies of the US saw our election of Obama as a blink. They will at least try to take advantage of our perceived weakness. I foresee trouble again in Iraq. Iran will be responsible, but will of course have Russia's permission. Iran cannot sneeze without Russia's permission. When the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan, it was because they wanted to reach the southern shore of Asia. They didn't choose Iran because they're already allies, so they didn't need to. Biden's prediction will be accurate to a point, but I don't even think he realizes how much Obama will be tested and by how many fronts this test will come from. Maybe by the end of the year to quell the Iraqi uprising, Biden's idea of partitioning Iraq will come to fruition. In 2008, it seemed like the whole world couldn't stand us. In 2009, it will seem like the whole world has risen up against us.
 
Economy - There is no way out of it. We are headed for very troubled times. I won't blame the year ahead economically on President Obama, but I fear his administration will make things worse for the long run. More borrowing and higher spending is the opposite of what we should be doing. He's still sticking to the tax cuts idea, but won't say when he will get rid of Bush's tax cuts on the supposed wealthy. That's more borrowing from countries like China. That weakens more the American dollar, which again fell against other currencies around the world. President Bush and the republicans from years ago have handed a heavy baton to President Obama, because they lost all fiscal responsibility. The republicans wanted to keep their power so they showed the dems they can even outspend them with pork projects and increased spending. During a time of war, that was a recipe for disaster. Instead of dems showing they can be somewhat fiscally responsible, they're going to say to the republicans "you think you can outspend us? We're democrats. No one outspends us! Who are you kidding?!" That will drop the already weak dollar even more. Factories and businesses will continue to close. Unemployment will crash the economy. I'm sorry to say, I really don't see a way out of this. Even the great optimists must have a feeling in the pit of their stomachs of our nation's future economic outlook. 2008 was only a prognosticator. 2009 will be the fulfillment.
 
Global Warming - Finally people will see this as a fraud perpetrated by those with a vested economic interest and a thirst to be in the news. This will be the second straight year of cooling weather. As winter approaches at the end of 2009, cold temperatures will again foretell a cooler than average season. That will be three winters in a row with cold temperatures. People will line up in front of Al Gore's mansion, snowballs at the ready waiting for him to peek his alpaca wearing head from around the corner. Scientists will point to the cooling trend as being a drop in sunspot activity. Instead of saying this comes in cycles, they will again predict an ice age looming. They don't care if they get proven wrong again. They just love being in the news.
 
These are a few of my predictions for 2009. I'm pretty good with my predictions I must admit. These predictions if they come true will not provide me with any satisfaction. They're too dire with too great of consequences. I will enjoy the global warming hysteria crumbling though. I have a feeling that I'm not the only one among you that will have a big smile over this. 2010 will begin where 2009 left off, but in the middle months things will change. They will not change for the better. Perhaps it will look as such, but the seeds of evil will be planted by the end of 2010. Oh! And a happy new year to you! ; )
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

THE REAL CHRISTMAS STORY

Even though people widely accept that Jesus, our Saviour was born on or close to December 25th, this is not really the case. When Jesus was born, it is written there were shepherds tending to their flocks at night. This would have only been done during the Harvest Moon. That would be right around late September. What the significance of December 25th is that it may have been the date Jesus was conceived by God. It would have been right around that time in order for him to be born right at the time of the Harvest Moon, so there is some significance of this date. This is the real miracle, right? Not the virgin birth, but the conception of a virgin. If a virgin is pregnant, she’s going to give birth. The miracle may have happened on December 25th, but Jesus was not born anywhere around that date.  Just one of those things Christians should know.

Many intellectuals claim that Christians stole Christmas from the pagans and took the tradition of decorating the tree from them also. That is only partly correct. The pagans did decorate their winter holiday trees, but they also worshipped them. Christians do not worship the trees they set up and decorate. Christians also give gifts to loved ones traditionally to honor what the three wise men did when they brought the baby Jesus gold, frankincense, and myrrh. Maybe many of them have lost the idea of that, but that’s how the tradition started.

Just thought it would be a good idea to set a couple of things straight as the anniversary of the conception of Christ comes. Merry Christmas everyone, and have a happy New Year. God bless.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

THE ATTACK UPON GOD

The attacks upon God and those who believe in Him are becoming more sharp and mainstream in recent years. What these so-called personal geniuses don’t realize is that they are fulfilling scripture by doing so. I hear these masters of the universe say the darnedest things with such fervor and authority about things they know nothing about. They always have to add that little shot to those who believe, especially Christians, saying that they are uneducated and believe in just an adult Santa Claus myth. Nothing like putting those down that disagree. I don’t mind taking shots or giving them much, but those I give the shots to have cast the first stone.

Atheists are prideful hypocrites who say they are for equal treatment and harmony among all of creation, when in fact they want to be recognized by everyone else as being the great thinkers of our time and never miss an opportunity to try to get under the skin of their Christian coinhabitants. They try as hard as they can to stick out from amongst the crowd with their middle-child syndrome. They especially use Christian holidays to make sure that they are heard. Anyone that says they are insulted or offended at God being referred to in our currency or a nativity scene displayed by a town or city during Christmas season is lying to you. One can’t look at a dollar bill and get irate. One can’t look at people praising someone they believe to be their Saviour and feel like they’ve had their faces spat upon. This is their way of letting you know they are smarter than you because they don’t believe in God. They believe in evolution.

The intellectuals and atheists are big believers in evolution. That is their reason for being. This is their god, whether they like to think of it this way or not. Evolution is their god. The supreme prophet of the Evolution god was Darwin. A prophet who didn’t even believe the theory he proposed himself. With this belief, it allows them to live their life without restriction. Why have restrictions when there is nothing to answer for after their lives are done? This is a benefit for their belief. Possibly even an excuse to not use their own willpower to do things their conscience tells them not to do. “If there’s no God, I don’t have to listen to my conscience. My conscience is just my mind playing tricks on me, mastered by the society of the feebleminded believers who think certain things are wrong. My conscience does not exist.”

The sad thing is that their belief in evolution has questions that they can’t answer themselves. I used to frustrate fifty year old adults when I was a teenager before I even read the Bible with my questions to them. I would ask them questions like “if evolution is real, then how come there are still cockroaches?” The best answer I got was “well some evolved and some didn’t.” I thought evolution was constant. Why would some of the species evolve but some not? That makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. There should not be dogs, birds, fish, mosquitos, or bears. If evolution really exists, then there should be at the most only a few species below us on Earth right now. Evolution is evolved. Evolved is evolution. Another question I asked was “if the Earth is four billion years old, is that enough time for an amoeba to make it all the way to a human considering there are well over a million different types of insect alone?” Seeing years of things they perceived to be facts erode on their faces was pretty sad to see. They didn’t like me much, those intellectuals, but they knew I was no fool. I heard one say “well there are different classes of species and that’s how it happened”. Well, how did they divide into those classes? What decision making ability was there to say “I’m going to turn into this now”? If a species adapts to that climate or environment, how do they change themselves? What creature was the first that said “I need a digestive system so I can nourish myself and excrete waste”, and then do it? If the first species to have nourishment from eating ate, they would die without a way to excrete the waste. That would be the end of that new species. For those who claim they are supergeniuses to the Nth degree, these questions they have not asked themselves doesn’t speak well of their thinking ability. Maybe they do think of those questions, but since this is their belief and it’s not in God, they’d rather just let it rest there and not wonder about things they don’t have the answers to. Willingly blinding themselves from their own accusation upon those they disagree, that Christians cannot think for themselves. Evolution is proof they cannot think very well. The true intellectual is the true fool. Even Bill Maher, who never fails to insult Christians, believes in evolution but admits something must have happened to get life started. DUH! Albert Einstein is known as maybe the smartest man in the last century, and he believed in God. He even went as far as to say that if anyone can look into the dark reaches of space and the glorious nature on Earth, and not realize there was a God to create it all is blind.

A favorite attack of these atheists and intellectuals upon those that believe in God say that there have been more people killed in the name of religion than anything else combined. Hogwash. Religion is just an excuse. Racism is at the crux of the matter when it comes to killing by the masses. Racism is the true reason. Religion, no matter what religion it is, is always the excuse. Before there were Irish Catholics and Protestants fighting eachother, there were the red and black Irish fighting. Before there were Sunni and Shiite, there were Arabs and Persians fighting. Look up your history. I know, again this is too easy to come up with, which reiterates my point that the true intellectual is the true fool.

Atheists say “how can you believe in something you can’t see?” I believe in love, but I’ve never seen love. I see the evidence of love everywhere, just as I see the evidence of God everywhere. Love cannot be seen by anyone. I know many atheists say that the Judeo-Christian God is invisible, like it’s written that He is somewhere in the Bible. Actually Moses saw God, but only from behind as God walked into the sanctuary as Moses and the Israelites roamed through the wilderness. Moses was not allowed to see God’s face, but he saw Him. Nowhere does it say God is invisible.

If an atheist is truly enquiring, then it’s good to talk about things of God. If you know things pretty assuringly, then speak with some authority. If you’re a product of traditional teaching, then I don’t suggest doing this because I can ask questions about your belief you cannot answer as well. This world is NOT seven thousand years old. Dinosaurs truly existed many thousands of years ago. Don’t let any traditional teacher fool you in stating otherwise. If an atheist is there to just rile you up and get under your skin by belittling what you believe in, then don’t cast your pearls. If they cannot admit the existence of their own conscience which is at no distance away from them, they aren’t ready to hear of the Truth far above their heads. God bless.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

MY RELIGIOUS BLOGS LIST

This is a list of Christian blogs I have written from my "One of the Election of Grace" page. In these blogs I correct misperceptions and give scripture to prove as such. On some occasions I will trace back certains words written in the Bible back to their original languages of Hebrew and Greek when necessary. Some of the posts are for the advanced learner, but all will read things they've never read before and will have their curiosity peaked. I urge you to take some time and read a few of these. You won't regret it.
 
Townhall.com - Election Of Grace  "THE CALLING OF THE ELECTION OF GRACE
 
 
 
 
Townhall.com - Election Of Grace  "WHAT EXACTLY WAS THE SIN OF ONAN"
 
 
Townhall.com - Election Of Grace  "THE RAPTURE TEACHING"
 
 
Townhall.com - Election Of Grace  "THE SECRET OF WORMWOOD IN REVELATION"
 
 
Townhall.com - Election Of Grace  "THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN HEAVEN AND EVERLASTING LIFE"
 
 
Townhall.com - Election Of Grace  "WHERE IS THE ARK OF THE COVENANT AND THE HOLY GRAIL"
 
 
Townhall.com - Election Of Grace  "WHO WILL BE THE ANTICHRIST?"
 
 

Townhall.com - Election Of Grace  "THE PROPHETS OF THE LAST GENERATION"
 
 
Townhall.com - Election Of Grace  "THE WISDOM OF THE ELECTION OF GRACE"
 
 
Townhall.com - Election Of Grace  "THE FALSE PROPHET, POPE PETRUS ROMANUS, AND THE CHURCH OF EPHESUS
 
 
Townhall.com - Election Of Grace  "THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN LUCIFER AND SATAN"
 
 
Townhall.com - Election Of Grace  "THE REAL BATTLE OF ARMAGEDDON"
 
 
Townhall.com - Election Of Grace  "ANTICHRIST POSSIBILITIES"
 
 
Townhall.com - Election Of Grace  "ANALYZING THE FOUR HORSEMEN OF THE APOCALYPSE"
 
 
Townhall.com - Election Of Grace  "CHRIST ON THE CROSS
 
 
Townhall.com - Election Of Grace  "GOD'S STANDARDS FOR SAINTHOOD"
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

GOD'S STANDARDS FOR SAINTHOOD

What God sees as a saint is far different than what men do. For some reason men have raised standards for sainthood far past God’s standards. The Catholic church makes it impossible in their own doctrine to become a saint. According to the Catholic church, a person has to perform three miracles in order to be qualified for canonization. That in itself is an error. No man performs a miracle. God does through that man or woman. That’s something the Catholic church should know on their own.

To become a saint in God’s eyes all a person has to do is have their faith in Jesus as the Messiah intact. Everyone who dies with their faith is a saint. Everyone. There are many, many saints upon this Earth right now. As is written in Ephesians 1:1, there were saints in Ephesus Paul wrote to. Those were just people who were Christians. People who accepted Christ fully in their hearts and humbled themselves before their Lord. Not people who brought fire out of the sky or healed the lame by having a missing limb grow back. As if men on their own had the ability to do that anyway. In Revelation 20 which is about the next age after Jesus returns, Jesus will reign on Earth with his saints for a thousand years. That is everyone who in this life has made the right choice will be here reaping their rewards and being with their loved ones, at least those who made the right choice. Not just those who Catholic doctrine says are saints.

So why do the standards of men far outreach the standards of God? An incredible amount of conceit, that’s why. That’s also why most teachers feel God’s elect are people who just chose Christ, even though the term is GOD’S elect. God’s choice, not man’s. Such highmindedness and self-empowerment is not what God wants us to have. To set standards higher than God’s isn’t something that makes God happy. That’s like saying to a soul that has done great things in the eyes of God “you can be His saint, but you’re not worthy of being one of ours. You should have performed three miracles which were all witnessed as well as this and that and then you could have joined us.” I’d rather be one of God’s saints than a saint in the eyes of men anytime anyway.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

CHRIST ON THE CROSS

One of the more puzzling things written in the Bible are during Christ’s last moments when he said “My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?” For some reason the traditional explanation is that this was Christ’s moment of doubt and pain. If that were the case, then he would have sinned. To accuse God of forsaking them is a sin for anyone. I know some will say “Jesus couldn’t sin”, but that’s foolish. That’s also shortchanging his painstaking life and death to say that he didn’t have the ability to sin. To pay such a heavy price of the sins of our creation, it wouldn’t be right if God cheated and made it to where his Messiah didn’t have the ability to sin. Plus, Satan did tempt Jesus in the desert. Why tempt someone that didn’t have the ability to sin? Why would Satan waste his breath? Satan knew exactly who Jesus was and knew he had the ability to sin. How many of you has he come to and offered all of the kingdoms of the world to? None.

So why wasn’t what Jesus said on the cross a sin? The genius of him saying that, and what he was referring to is beyond amazing. Him saying that was designed to make a wise person ask that question, as long as they aren’t too influenced by the traditional teaching of men. In order for Jesus to be the Messiah, then he had to live his life, from beginning to end without sin. So why wasn’t that a sin? Maybe instead of talking to God, maybe he had something else on his mind. “He said ‘my God, why hast thou forsaken me”, so of course he was talking to God.” Well, actually that isn’t the case at all.

What Jesus did by saying that on the cross was to fulfill scripture. What scripture? Psalm 22. Psalm 22 starts off by saying “My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?” It’s been there the whole time. You read that psalm down to verse 16 and it says “For dogs have compassed me, the assembly of the wicked have inclosed me; they pierced my hands and my feet.” That is how Christ died. He had his hands and feet pierced, did he not? When were the psalms written? Most, if not all of the psalms were written by King David around 1000 BC. This was written a thousand years before Christ was on the cross. In verse 18 it says his garments were sold, just like what was written in the gospels. What is more amazing is when you really analyze that whole thing, the Jews knew nothing of crucifixion until the Romans came in 76 BC. This was written around nine hundred years before that. Psalm 22 is obviously the prophecy of the Messiah’s last moments. Only the truly blind will say it is not after reading it, which I had one try to tell me not too long ago.

Why Jesus didn’t sin when he said that on the cross was because he wasn’t talking to God at all. He was fulfilling scripture. He was saying Psalm 22 is him. That shows how genius Psalm 22 even is. It’s supposed to, when Jesus repeats it on the cross, make us ask “why wasn’t that a sin?” So it’s up to us to find the answer somewhere.

Not only does it prove Jesus was the Messiah, to which no explanation by an atheist can come up with as a counter, but it also brings the Old and the New Testaments together. It proves there must be a prophetic author. It proves that both books are written by God through the Holy Spirit and out of His elect. Just by that psalm and what Jesus said on the cross proves all of these things beyond any skeptic’s analytical power attempting to tear it down. They can’t do it. Point this out to them and see if they can. Watch them scramble and struggle to find an answer for this.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (13) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

ANALYZING THE FOUR HORSEMEN OF THE APOCALYPSE

The four horsemen of the Apocalypse is one of the most intriguing tales of the Bible. Each rider of the horse brings about a plague that is designed to make it difficult for men. Prideful men. Things to humble men down from their self-imposed pedestals. Men, fools and teachers alike wonder aloud “why would a good God let this happen?” The answer is beyond their comprehension at least at this point in this age’s history. At the blowing of the seventh trump, they will have their answer. All of God’s mysteries will be revealed and the spirit of slumber upon them will be lifted. Until then, it is not for anyone but the election of grace to know. They do not have the spirit of slumber. I will say this though, our souls are much older than our bodies. This Earth despite what your teachers have told you is much older than a few thousand years old. This age is several thousand years old. Not the world. If you trace what is written in the NT back to the original Greek, you would see that this is an age we’re living in. There will be another one afterward. Being that our souls are much older than our human bodies, there are things our creation may have done beforehand that God found disgraceful. Some, albeit very few never offended God. That’s how God chose certain people to be his prophets. As God told Jeremiah, “I knew you when you were in your mother’s womb” meaning God knew him before he was in his mother’s womb. There must have been a reason why God chose Jeremiah and other prophets to be His prophets. God would not create a soul and say at random “okay, you’re going to be my prophet”. There are things at work here that will be revealed, perhaps in this very generation itself.

The rider of the first horse of the Apocalypse is riding a white horse. His power was to be able to conquer much of Earth. The color of the horse being white is significant because this is the Antichrist who will be as Christ coming in riding on a white horse. The Antichrist will conquer the world to be his one world government. We’re closer to that now than anyone might think. With the recent economic collapses revealing the vulnerabilities of the global economy, it goes to show our economies are already tied to one another.

The rider of the red horse is next, and his power was to take peace from the Earth. Again, we’re right at the door of this possibly happening. Iran is close to having a nuclear bomb to which Israel cannot let them have. Israel as they have done in times past will see to it that this does not come to pass. Iran has the backing of many countries which are not coincidentally the same countries listed as the ones written in the Bible that will come against Israel. The Arab World, Russia, China, and others will be among these nations. Right now a snapping of a twig can send this world into a world war. Even nonbelievers can see this as a possibility.

The rider of the black horse is more nuanced than the others. He was given a pair of balances. There was a voice that said “a measure of wheat for a penny, and three measures of barley for a penny; and see thou hurt not the oil and the wine.” As most know, this is a plague on the economy. What is a bit of a mystery is how specific this plague really is and it goes to show how subtle some of God’s words really are. One part is that the oil and the wine aren’t actually oil and wine at all. If there is a great plague upon the economy, of course oil and wine would be hurt. Oil you don’t just cook with but you anoint with. Wine is fermented grape juice, but during fermentation impurities come out of the grape juice. What that really says is “don’t hurt the anointed and the pure”. To prove this further, Psalm 105:15 says “touch not mine anointed, and do my prophets no harm.” Exactly what my interpretation of Revelation 4:6. It’s either that or that the price of oil and wine will not go up when everything else does. You be the judge. Two, specifically one measure of wheat and three measures of barley make up a good sized loaf of bread. You can make two decent sized loaves of bread. It says that each a measure of wheat and three measures of barley are a penny. What is a penny according to what is written? The answer is in Matthew chapter 20. Just about all of that chapter is a parable from Christ which means that it doesn’t matter when a person comes to Christ in their life. That they will receive the same things a person will receive if they came to Christ early in their lives. Hidden in that parable is what a penny is. The man who owned the land offered men to work in his field a penny for a day’s work. That seems so innocent there and one would just blow by it except for one of the elect. A penny represents a poor working man’s daily wage. This clarifies the economic plague of the black horse making it mean it would take a poor working man’s daily wage to be able to buy a loaf or so of bread. If that seems far-fetched as how there could be a plague so strong, one must be a student of history. In Russia shortly before and after communism fell, people lined up in the streets to pay $20 for a loaf of bread. I remember bread being mentioned specifically in those old news stories. This will be a plague of great economic woe and will give power to the one who has “the solution”.

The rider of the last horse rides a pale horse. Perhaps the worst of all of the horsemen. The rider of the pale horse had Hell follow with him. His name was Death. This is no longer the Antichrist as a human being anymore, but Satan being kicked down to Earth himself. Satan is Death, and Hell will follow him. Satan will make war with Israel and the nations aligned with Israel. War, hunger, and pestilences will kill a fourth part of the Earth. Pestilence isn’t written there specifically, but among the things described by Jesus in Matthew 24 and other gospels when he describes the end times says that there will be many pestilences. We’ve had SARS and the bird flu threaten to take many people for the last several years now. An outbreak of either or both would do great damage. AIDS already has taken many, and continues to be the biggest threat to the people of Africa.

These plagues are frightening to say the least, but if this is the generation to see it then it has a lot of work to do. This is the most selfish and lost generation in this age’s history. So many do not believe and belittle things that are of God. Many who do believe don’t fully believe what is written. “It’s all in the interpretation” I’ve heard many times. That’s such a lazy thought to have. Of course it’s in the interpretation, but God’s word is GOD’S WORD. Not man’s. Trace things back to the original languages of Hebrew and Greek. Those are God’s words written in its original form. The King James is man’s translation of God’s word. Read with a Strong’s Concordance which will explain to you what it originally says in the Hebrew for the OT and the Greek for the NT. Get ready. Prepare yourselves. We are at the door.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous123Next »